Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Spotlight: Alternatives to pyrotechnic distress signals

Sunday, July 15, 2018

Written by Loretta Haring
Office of Strategic Planning and Communication, Acquisition Directorate

A red handheld flare, the minimum pyrotechnic for which the project investigated alternatives. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

A red handheld flare, the minimum pyrotechnic for which the project investigated alternatives. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

Distress flares are vital to boating safety, but pyrotechnic flares can pose a safety hazard to people not trained in their use. In addition, expired flares can create environmental hazards through leaching chemicals when disposed of in landfills or at sea. As an alternative, the Coast Guard has been researching the suitability of light emitting diode (LED) devices as effective distress signals through its Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Program.

The Coast Guard offices of Search and Rescue, Auxiliary and Boating Safety, and Design and Engineering Standards, Lifesaving and Fire Safety Division (CG-ENG-4) recognized that pyrotechnic distress signals are old technology. Existing distress signal requirements and electric distress signal specifications as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations need to be revised to match the advanced technology and performance capabilities of newer devices, said Martin Jackson, a staff engineer with CG-ENG-4.

The Coast Guard Research and Development Center (RDC) in New London, Connecticut, initiated a multi-year project to develop a signal characteristic that could be used as an alternative to a pyrotechnic signal.

“The advancement of Coast Guard missions to enhance maritime safety, protect the environment, and provide better electronic visual distress signal devices for recreational boaters that are safer to use for search and rescue and allow easy recycling of batteries were the drivers for this project,” Jackson said. “RDC was the one place with the necessary expertise to assess the field of signal devices; test alternative signals; establish the critical characteristics that enhance visual detection, particularly for the recreational boater; and increase the probability of rescue in a distress situation.”

The project initially emphasized finding the right combination of conspicuous, nighttime, visual characteristics that could meet or exceed that of traditional signals. After a series of laboratory and field vision-research tests that included many colors and flash patterns, the project team recommended a group-flash, alternating cyan and red-orange color, 4 hertz characteristic.

Two signal boats off Eatons Neck, N.Y., prepare to proceed to positions six miles away during one round of field testing by the Coast Guard Research and Development Center to determine the suitability of potential alternatives to pyrotechnic visual distress signals. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

Two signal boats off Eatons Neck, N.Y., prepare to proceed to positions six miles away during one round of field testing by the Coast Guard Research and Development Center to determine the suitability of potential alternatives to pyrotechnic visual distress signals. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

“It was interesting to learn that at six miles, most observers thought a red flare looked like a vessel sidelight, while they easily identified the cyan and red-orange characteristic,” said project manager M.J. Lewandowski, who works in the Environment and Waterways Branch at RDC.

However, Coast Guard aviation representatives pointed out that the ideal visual signal might not be good for searchers using night-vision imaging systems with “minus-blue” filtering. An additional field test developed a near-infrared component to the characteristic, allowing full night-vision imaging system detectability.

During the RDC research project, the Office of Design and Engineering Standards requested the Radio Technical Commission for Maritime Services (RTCM) institute a special committee to develop a “standard” that incorporates the new signal characteristic into a producible device. Once manufactured, such a device could act as a substitute for pyrotechnic flare carriage requirements on recreational vessels.

Manufacturers had concerns about LED cost and power use, which led to more testing in 2017. Though results were similar to beforehand, observer test-results indicated that a red-orange/cyan, quick-flashing SOS pattern might be more identifiable as a distress signal.

Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary and U.S. Power Squadron enthusiastically serve as observer subjects during nighttime testing. The observers spent many hours in the cold and dark helping with the RDC project. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

Members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary and U.S. Power Squadron enthusiastically serve as observer subjects during nighttime testing. The observers spent many hours in the cold and dark helping with the RDC project. U.S. Coast Guard photo.

The resulting standard on electronic visual distress signal devices (eVDSDs), published June 21, 2018, by RTCM, “opens the door to permit a new type of LED-based visual distress signal with advanced technology that is both safer for the user and environmentally friendly,” Jackson said.

Manufacture and marketing of a device with this unique, conspicuous and identifiable two-hour signal will provide recreational mariners a tool that lasts far longer than current pyrotechnic flares, allowing searchers more opportunities to locate the mariner in distress. In turn, locating those in distress sooner could both save more lives and lessen the number of search hours.

The eVDSD may also have applicability in commercial vessel distress signal applications, Jackson said, “eventually replacing pyrotechnic distress signals on an international scale as well.”

This project ended May 30, 2018, but a follow-on project is planned to examine the effectiveness of daytime distress signals.

“As always, the RDC team did a great job on this project; their inclusive approach allowed for continuous improvements to the products and requirements,” said Karin Messenger, Environment and Waterways domain lead for CG-926. “Along with the efforts of the Coast Guard Office of Design and Engineering Standards, an updated distress signal will provide an important and significant opportunity to enhance boating safety.”

 

Comments


  1. Phil kraus says:

    Very cool and so necessary to boaters who Need to take Safety First to protect themselves, passengers and other boaters as well.
    How does this compare to the battery operated VDS that blinks SOS for hours at a cost of $100 and is waterproof??
    Phil Kraus
    FSO-VE
    054-10-01


Leave a Comment




We welcome your comments on postings at all Coast Guard sites/journals. These are sponsored by the U.S. Coast Guard to provide a forum to talk about our work providing maritime safety, security and stewardship for the American people to secure the homeland, save lives and property, protect the environment, and promote economic prosperity.

The information provided is for public information only and is not a distress communication channel. People in an emergency and in need of Coast Guard assistance should use VHF-FM Channel 16 (156.8 MHz), dial 911, or call their nearest Coast Guard unit.

All comments submitted are moderated. The Coast Guard retains the discretion to determine which comments it will post and which it will not. We expect all contributors to be respectful. We will not post comments that contain personal attacks of any kind; refer to Coast Guard or other employees by name; contain offensive terms that target specific ethnic or racial groups, or contain vulgar language. We will also not post comments that are spam, are clearly off topic, or that promote services or products.

The U.S. Coast Guard disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from any comments posted on this page. This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

If you have specific questions regarding a U.S. Coast Guard program that involves details you do not wish to share publicly please contact the program point of contact listed at http://www.uscg.mil/global/mail/

The U.S. Coast Guard will not collect or retain Personally Identifiable Information unless you voluntarily provide it to us. To view the U.S. Coast Guards Privacy Policy, please visit: http://www.uscg.mil/global/disclaim.asp

Please note: Anonymous comments have been disabled for this journal. It is preferred that you use your real name when posting a comment. WE WILL POST THE NAME YOU ENTER WHEN YOU SUBMIT YOUR COMMENT. Also, you are welcome to use Open ID or other user technologies that may be available.